<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Liberty Law Library</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/</link>
<description>Plain-language reference for demanding areas of American law</description><language>en-us</language>
<item><title>The Economic Methodology Behind an Indirect Job Count</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-economic-methodology-behind-a-job-count/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-economic-methodology-behind-a-job-count/</guid><description>Indirect and induced employment is estimated using regional input-output models that convert project expenditure or revenue into implied jobs through industry multipliers. The statute requires methodologies that are economically and statistically valid, and the project application must carry a credible economic analysis based on transparent methods. Disputes turn on the inputs used, the industry codes selected, the geographic region modeled, and whether the same activity has been counted twice.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>Which Agency Controls a Product</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/which-agency-controls-a-product/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/which-agency-controls-a-product/</guid><description>Defense articles and defense services described on the United States Munitions List at 22 CFR 121.1 are controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, administered under authority of 22 U.S.C. 2778. Items not described there may be subject to the Export Administration Regulations at 15 CFR 730 to 774. The order of review in 22 CFR 120.11 directs a reader to the munitions list first, and a commodity jurisdiction request resolves genuine doubt.</description><category>Sanctions &amp; Export Control</category></item><item><title>Denials, Appeals and Motions on an Investor Petition</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/denials-appeals-and-motions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/denials-appeals-and-motions/</guid><description>A denied investor petition may be challenged by an appeal to the Administrative Appeals Office or by a motion to reopen or reconsider filed with the office that decided the case. Both are made on the same form and both carry short deadlines running from the decision. An approved petition may be revoked on notice, which is separately appealable. A denied residence application carries no administrative appeal, but may be renewed before an immigration judge in removal proceedings.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>What Counts as a Targeted Employment Area</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/what-counts-as-a-targeted-employment-area/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/what-counts-as-a-targeted-employment-area/</guid><description>A targeted employment area is a rural area or an area the Secretary of Homeland Security has designated as one of high unemployment. Rural means outside every metropolitan statistical area and outside any city or town of twenty thousand or more. High unemployment means a census tract, or contiguous tracts where the enterprise is principally doing business, whose weighted average unemployment rate is at least 150 percent of the national rate. No state or local official may designate one.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>Listing on the National Register: Criteria and Process</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/national-register-listing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/national-register-listing/</guid><description>Under 36 CFR 60.4 a district, site, building, structure or object qualifies for the National Register if it possesses integrity and meets one of four criteria: association with significant events, association with significant persons, distinctive design or construction, or the capacity to yield important information. Nominations travel through the State Historic Preservation Officer and a state review board to the Keeper, and 36 CFR 60.6 gives a private owner an objection that blocks listing.</description><category>Historic Preservation</category></item><item><title>Good Faith Investors and Program Integrity Protections</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/good-faith-investor-protections/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/good-faith-investor-protections/</guid><description>Where a regional center is terminated or an enterprise or job-creating entity is debarred, an otherwise qualified petition remains valid and conditional residence continues, subject to a cure within one hundred and eighty days of notification. The cure is reassociation with an approved center, a qualifying investment elsewhere, or association with an enterprise in good standing plus capital to meet remaining job creation. The priority date is retained.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>Filing a Qui Tam Complaint Under Seal</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/filing-a-qui-tam-complaint-under-seal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/filing-a-qui-tam-complaint-under-seal/</guid><description>Under 31 U.S.C. 3730(b) a private relator may sue in the name of the United States. The complaint is filed in camera, remains under seal for at least sixty days, and is not served on the defendant until the court orders it. A copy of the complaint and a written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the relator possesses must be served on the government. The United States is the real party in interest throughout.</description><category>Whistleblower Law</category></item><item><title>Suing a Foreign State: Immunity as the Default</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/suing-a-foreign-state/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/suing-a-foreign-state/</guid><description>The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act makes a foreign state immune from the jurisdiction of federal and state courts except as the statute itself provides, and it is the sole basis for obtaining jurisdiction over a foreign state. A foreign state includes its political subdivisions and its agencies and instrumentalities. Exceptions cover waiver, commercial activity, certain expropriations, property in the United States, some domestic torts, and arbitration.</description><category>Cross-Border Litigation</category></item><item><title>End-Use, End-User and Red Flag Screening</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/end-use-and-red-flag-screening/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/end-use-and-red-flag-screening/</guid><description>The export rules impose prohibitions that operate independently of an item&#39;s classification. Restricted party lists identify entities to which specified transactions require authorization or are denied outright. End-use prohibitions in 15 CFR Part 744 apply where an exporter knows or has reason to know that an item is intended for a prohibited use or user. Knowledge includes awareness of a high probability, so unresolved warning signs can supply the required state of mind.</description><category>Sanctions &amp; Export Control</category></item><item><title>Escrow Arrangements and the Release Conditions</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/escrow-arrangements-and-release/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/escrow-arrangements-and-release/</guid><description>Escrow places subscription funds with a neutral holder until stated conditions occur, protecting an investor against the risk of a failed filing or an unraised offering. Because capital held in escrow has not been placed at the enterprise&#39;s disposal, it is not yet exposed to loss and does not begin the sustainment period or generate jobs. Release triggers have therefore moved earlier, and the terms of the agreement decide who bears the risk in the gap.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>Conditional Residence and the Two-Year Clock</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/conditional-residence-and-the-two-year-clock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/conditional-residence-and-the-two-year-clock/</guid><description>An investor, spouse and child obtain lawful permanent residence on a conditional basis, and the condition runs for two years from the date the status was granted. The status carries the ordinary rights of permanent residence and the period counts toward naturalization. It can end early on a determination that the investment was improper, on failure to file the petition to remove conditions, or on failure to appear at a required interview, with the burden allocated differently in each case.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>Forum Objections and Parallel Proceedings Abroad</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/forum-non-conveniens-and-parallel-suits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/forum-non-conveniens-and-parallel-suits/</guid><description>Forum non conveniens permits a court with jurisdiction to dismiss where an adequate alternative forum exists and the balance of private and public interest factors strongly favors trial there. An alternative forum is adequate where the defendant is amenable to process and the remedy is not so unsatisfactory as to be no remedy at all. A foreign plaintiff&#39;s choice of forum receives less deference than a domestic plaintiff&#39;s.</description><category>Cross-Border Litigation</category></item><item><title>Federal Undertakings and What Triggers Review</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/federal-undertakings-and-the-review-trigger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/federal-undertakings-and-the-review-trigger/</guid><description>Under 36 CFR 800.16(y) an undertaking is a project, activity or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a federal agency, carried out by or on behalf of an agency, carried out with federal financial assistance, or requiring a federal permit, license or approval. Section 800.3 requires the agency to decide first whether an undertaking exists and then whether it is the type of activity with potential to cause effects on historic properties.</description><category>Historic Preservation</category></item><item><title>Blocked Persons: What a Listing Does to Property and Dealings</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/blocked-persons-and-what-listing-does/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/blocked-persons-and-what-listing-does/</guid><description>Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act at 50 U.S.C. 1701 to 1707 and the regulations in 31 CFR Chapter V, property and interests in property of a designated person that come within the United States or within the possession or control of a United States person are blocked. Blocked property may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn or otherwise dealt in. Holders must report blocked property and rejected transactions within the periods the regulations fix.</description><category>Sanctions &amp; Export Control</category></item><item><title>The Set-Aside Visa Categories and the Queues They Created</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-set-aside-visa-categories/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-set-aside-visa-categories/</guid><description>Of the visas made available each fiscal year under the fifth employment-based preference, twenty percent are reserved for immigrants who invest in a rural area, ten percent for those who invest in an area the Secretary of Homeland Security has designated as one of high unemployment, and two percent for infrastructure projects. The remainder is unreserved. Unused reserved numbers stay in their own category for one further fiscal year and then fall into the unreserved pool.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>Investor Status and the Tax Residency It Creates</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/investor-status-and-tax-residency/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/investor-status-and-tax-residency/</guid><description>Tax residence is determined by the Internal Revenue Code rather than by immigration status. A person who holds lawful permanent residence is a tax resident from the first day of that status, and a nonimmigrant who is present for enough days under a weighted three-year formula is a tax resident regardless of the visa held. Residence brings taxation on worldwide income and extensive foreign asset reporting, and long-term residents face a tax on giving the status up.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>The Commercial Activity Exception</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-commercial-activity-exception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-commercial-activity-exception/</guid><description>A foreign state loses immunity where the action is based upon commercial activity carried on in the United States, upon an act performed here in connection with commercial activity elsewhere, or upon an act outside the United States in connection with commercial activity elsewhere that causes a direct effect here. Commercial character is determined by the nature of the conduct rather than its purpose, following the market-player test in Weltover.</description><category>Cross-Border Litigation</category></item><item><title>The Record on Appeal and How Gaps Are Filled</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-record-on-appeal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-record-on-appeal/</guid><description>Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(a) defines the record on appeal as the original papers and exhibits filed in the district court, the transcript of proceedings, and a certified copy of the docket entries. Rule 10(b) requires the appellant to order a transcript or certify that none will be ordered, and to serve a statement of issues where only part is ordered. Rules 10(c) and 10(d) supply a prepared statement or an agreed statement where no transcript is available.</description><category>Appellate Practice</category></item><item><title>Applying for a Specific License</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/applying-for-a-specific-license/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/applying-for-a-specific-license/</guid><description>Where no exemption or general authorization covers conduct that a sanctions program prohibits, the route is an application for a specific license under 31 CFR 501.801 and 501.802. The application must identify the parties, describe the transaction in full and attach supporting documentation, and the office may require further information before deciding. A license authorizes only the described activity, on the conditions stated, and does not excuse conduct that has already occurred.</description><category>Sanctions &amp; Export Control</category></item><item><title>Premarket Notification Compared With Premarket Approval</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/notification-compared-with-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/notification-compared-with-approval/</guid><description>Premarket notification under 21 U.S.C. 360(k) asks whether a device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate, meaning the same intended use and either the same technological characteristics or different ones raising no different questions of safety and effectiveness. Premarket approval under 21 U.S.C. 360e asks whether valid scientific evidence provides reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.</description><category>Drug &amp; Device Regulation</category></item><item><title>The Return Petition and What the Applicant Must Prove</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-return-petition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-return-petition/</guid><description>Under Article 3 of the Abduction Convention and 22 U.S.C. 9003, a petitioner seeking return must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the child was habitually resident in the requesting country, that the petitioner held rights of custody under that country&#39;s law, that those rights were actually being exercised, and that the removal or retention breached them. The court decides location, not custody.</description><category>International Family Law</category></item><item><title>The Consultation Sequence and Its Agreement Documents</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-consultation-sequence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-consultation-sequence/</guid><description>Subpart B of 36 CFR Part 800 sets out four steps: initiation under 800.3, identification of historic properties under 800.4, assessment of adverse effects under 800.5, and resolution under 800.6. The preservation officer, Indian tribes, local governments, the applicant and interested members of the public are consulting parties. Resolution normally ends in a memorandum of agreement, or in a programmatic agreement for complex or repeated undertakings.</description><category>Historic Preservation</category></item><item><title>Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/rehearing-and-en-banc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/rehearing-and-en-banc/</guid><description>Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40 allows a petition for panel rehearing stating with particularity each point of law or fact the petitioner believes the court overlooked or misapprehended. Rule 35 governs rehearing en banc, which is not favored and is ordered only where necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court&#39;s decisions or where the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance. Rule 41 controls when the mandate issues and how it may be stayed.</description><category>Appellate Practice</category></item><item><title>Brief Requirements and the Argument Section</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/brief-requirements/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/brief-requirements/</guid><description>Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a) lists what an appellant&#39;s brief must contain, including a corporate disclosure statement, tables, a jurisdictional statement, a statement of the issues, a statement of the case with record references, a summary of the argument, the argument itself with the standard of review for each issue, a conclusion, and the required certificates. Rule 32 governs form, typeface and the word limits, and requires a certificate of compliance.</description><category>Appellate Practice</category></item><item><title>The Notice of Appeal and the Deadline That Cannot Be Extended</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-notice-of-appeal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-notice-of-appeal/</guid><description>Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3 requires an appeal as of right to be taken by filing a notice of appeal with the district clerk, specifying the party appealing, designating the judgment or order appealed from, and naming the court to which the appeal is taken. Rule 4 fixes the time: thirty days after entry in an ordinary civil case, sixty days where the United States or a federal officer or agency is a party, and fourteen days for a criminal defendant.</description><category>Appellate Practice</category></item><item><title>Enforcing a Judgment Once It Is Recognized</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/enforcing-a-recognized-judgment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/enforcing-a-recognized-judgment/</guid><description>A foreign money judgment that has been recognized is enforceable in the same manner as a judgment of a sister state. Execution follows the procedure of the state where the enforcing court sits, and the creditor must domesticate the judgment separately in each state where assets are located. Post-judgment discovery is broad and reaches third parties. Currency conversion and interest are governed by the forum&#39;s own rules rather than by the rendering court&#39;s.</description><category>Cross-Border Litigation</category></item><item><title>The Fifty Percent Ownership Rule</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-fifty-percent-ownership-rule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-fifty-percent-ownership-rule/</guid><description>Because property in which a blocked person has an interest is itself blocked, an entity owned fifty percent or more in the aggregate, directly or indirectly, by one or more blocked persons is treated as blocked even though it is not named on any list. Ownership interests held by several blocked persons are added together, and the rule passes down through chains of ownership. Control without ownership does not trigger the rule but carries substantial risk.</description><category>Sanctions &amp; Export Control</category></item><item><title>Direct Shipping to Consumers Across State Lines</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/direct-shipping-to-consumers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/direct-shipping-to-consumers/</guid><description>Direct shipment to consumers is permitted by the receiving state, not by federal law, and typically requires a direct shipper permit issued by that state. Common conditions include volume caps per household, adult signature on delivery, marking of the shipping container, remittance of the state&#39;s excise and sales taxes, periodic reporting, and use of an approved carrier. Under Granholm a state may not allow in-state producers to ship while forbidding out-of-state producers from doing the same.</description><category>Alcohol Beverage Law</category></item><item><title>Mixed Questions and Which Standard Applies to Them</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/mixed-questions-and-which-standard-applies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/mixed-questions-and-which-standard-applies/</guid><description>Appellate courts review questions of law without deference, findings of fact for clear error under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a)(6), and discretionary rulings for abuse of discretion. A mixed question applies a legal standard to established facts, and courts allocate it by asking whether resolving it requires expounding the law or immersion in the particular record. The more legal the inquiry, the closer review comes to de novo.</description><category>Appellate Practice</category></item><item><title>Securities Law and the Investment Offering</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/securities-law-and-the-offering/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/securities-law-and-the-offering/</guid><description>A limited partnership interest or non-managing membership interest sold to an immigrant investor is ordinarily an investment contract and therefore a security. Selling a security requires registration unless an exemption applies, and these offerings almost always rely on the private placement exemption and its Regulation D safe harbor, often with the offshore safe harbor for sales made abroad. Exemptions relieve registration only; the antifraud provisions still apply.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>Lay Opinion and the Line Against Expert Testimony</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/lay-opinion-and-its-limit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/lay-opinion-and-its-limit/</guid><description>Federal Rule of Evidence 701 permits a witness not testifying as an expert to give an opinion that is rationally based on the witness&#39;s own perception, helpful to clearly understanding the testimony or determining a fact in issue, and not based on scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702. Rule 602 separately requires personal knowledge, and the two provisions together mark the boundary against expert opinion in ordinary clothing.</description><category>Evidence &amp; Proof</category></item><item><title>Filing Adjustment of Status Alongside the Investor Petition</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/concurrent-filing-of-adjustment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/concurrent-filing-of-adjustment/</guid><description>Adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act lets an investor already inside the United States become a permanent resident without a consular appointment. The fifth preference statute permits the residence application to be filed together with the petition where an immigrant visa number is immediately available. A pending application supports employment authorization and advance parole, but departure without advance parole abandons it.</description><category>Investor Immigration</category></item><item><title>Exceptions That Require the Declarant to Be Unavailable</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/exceptions-requiring-unavailability/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/exceptions-requiring-unavailability/</guid><description>Federal Rule of Evidence 804 makes certain hearsay admissible only once the declarant is shown to be unavailable. Rule 804(a) defines unavailability through five grounds: privilege, refusal despite an order, lack of memory, death or infirmity, and absence the proponent could not overcome. Rule 804(b) then admits former testimony, statements made under a belief of imminent death, statements against interest, statements of family history, and statements against a party that caused the absence.</description><category>Evidence &amp; Proof</category></item><item><title>Employment Agreements That Try to Bar Whistleblowing</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/agreements-that-try-to-bar-whistleblowing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/agreements-that-try-to-bar-whistleblowing/</guid><description>Rule 21F-17 provides that no person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with Commission staff about a possible securities law violation, including by enforcing or threatening to enforce a confidentiality agreement. The commodities rules contain a parallel prohibition. Section 3730(h) separately entitles an employee, contractor or agent who suffers retaliation to reinstatement, double back pay with interest and special damages.</description><category>Whistleblower Law</category></item><item><title>Adverse Effect Findings and What Mitigation Can Require</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/adverse-effect-and-mitigation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/adverse-effect-and-mitigation/</guid><description>Section 800.5 of 36 CFR finds an adverse effect where an undertaking may alter, directly or indirectly, any characteristic qualifying a property for the National Register in a manner that diminishes the integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association. The listed examples include destruction, treatment inconsistent with the Secretary&#39;s Standards, relocation, visual and audible intrusions, neglect, and transfer out of federal control.</description><category>Historic Preservation</category></item><item><title>Taking Evidence Abroad: Letters of Request</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/taking-evidence-abroad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/taking-evidence-abroad/</guid><description>Under the Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, a judicial authority in one party state sends a letter of request to a designated central authority in another, which has its own courts obtain the evidence. Execution follows the requested state&#39;s procedures unless a special method is asked for and is not incompatible. Article 23 lets a state refuse requests aimed at pre-trial discovery of documents, and most have.</description><category>Cross-Border Litigation</category></item><item><title>Character Evidence and Its Exceptions</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/character-evidence-and-exceptions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/character-evidence-and-exceptions/</guid><description>Federal Rule of Evidence 404(a) prohibits evidence of a person&#39;s character or character trait offered to prove that the person acted in accordance with it on a particular occasion. Rule 404(b) permits evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts when offered for a purpose other than propensity, such as motive, intent, knowledge, identity or absence of mistake. Rule 405 controls the permitted methods of proof, and Rule 406 treats habit and routine practice as outside the prohibition entirely.</description><category>Evidence &amp; Proof</category></item><item><title>Judicial Notice, Burdens and Presumptions</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/judicial-notice-burdens-and-presumptions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/judicial-notice-burdens-and-presumptions/</guid><description>Federal Rule of Evidence 201 permits judicial notice of an adjudicative fact not subject to reasonable dispute because it is generally known in the trial court&#39;s territory or can be accurately and readily determined from unquestionable sources. In a civil case the jury must accept a noticed fact; in a criminal case it may but need not. Rule 301 provides that a presumption in a civil case shifts the burden of producing evidence to rebut it but does not shift the burden of persuasion.</description><category>Evidence &amp; Proof</category></item><item><title>The Seal Period, Extensions and What May Not Be Said</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-seal-period-and-extensions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/the-seal-period-and-extensions/</guid><description>Section 3730(b)(3) allows the government to move for extensions of the sixty-day seal for good cause, and those motions are made in camera. The seal binds the relator as well as the government: the existence of the action, its contents and the identity of the defendant are not to be disclosed. Breaking the seal does not automatically end the case, and courts weigh the harm to the government, the severity of the violation and evidence of bad faith.</description><category>Whistleblower Law</category></item><item><title>What Listing Does and Does Not Restrict</title><link>https://libertylawexperts.com/library/what-listing-does-and-does-not-restrict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://libertylawexperts.com/library/what-listing-does-and-does-not-restrict/</guid><description>National Register listing is honorific and procedural. It does not require an owner to maintain, restore, open or preserve a property, and it does not prevent alteration or demolition carried out with private funds and without federal involvement. What listing does is bring a property within 54 U.S.C. 306108, which requires a federal agency to take the effects of its undertakings into account, and it establishes eligibility for the federal rehabilitation credit and certain grants.</description><category>Historic Preservation</category></item></channel></rss>